EMBL Logo
Travel and Contact  Staff Only  Site Map  Help?   
Research in Molecular Biology
EMBL Grenoble EMBL Hamburg EMBL heidelberg EMBL-EBI Hinxton EMBL Monterotondo
EMBLAbout UsScience and SocietyEMBL Forum LecturesPast Seminars2004
General Information
News and Communication
Today at EMBL
Courses and Conferences
Seminars
Jobs
Alumni Association
Resource Development
Science and Society
EMBL/EMBO
Joint Conferences
Symposia
EMBL Forum Lectures
Past EMBL Forum Lectures
2004
Discussion Meetings
Heidelberg Forum
Publications
PhD Symposium Writing Prize
Related Links
Advanced Training Centre Project
About Us Research Services Education
Image 1 Image 1 Audience
EMBL Forum Past Seminars 2004
20 February 2004
Anthropology and the Natural Sciences
From subatomic to global systems
Jonathan Friedman, Lund University and EHESS [GTMS]

Throughout this century there has been a rather interesting series of exchanges between anthropology and the natural sciences. Part of this is related to the structure of the discipline in the United States where physical anthropology, today human biology, was part of a general curriculum along with related subjects such as paleontology, prehistoric archaeology, and even linguistics and cognitive anthropology which had connections to neurology, cognitive science and related subjets. This interest was also present in Europe, of course, and the efforts that led to the initiating of the Centre Royaumont Pour Une Science de l'Homme was an important landmark in the cooperation between biological and social sciences. In the Eighties all of this faded or even turned into conflict. The so-called 'cultural turn', the disinterest in theory and the suspicion of natural sciences became rampant in the United States, and the natural science oriented sections within anthropology departments became increasingly enamored of sociobiology and what some would call genetic reductionism. Human biology was strongly influenced in this period by the emerging field of evolutionary psychology and other genetically oriented approaches. Departments became factionalized in many places between the 'cultural/humanists' and the 'scientists' and instead of dialogue there was war in which tribal identities were more important than understanding and knowledge. With a certain amount of variability the human biologists, cognitivists, and archaeologists tend to group themselves in the science camp, leaving the increasingly postmodernizing cultural and social anthropologists in the humanist camp. The situation today has not improved a great deal and it is a great loss for all involved.

In this presentation I shall try to outline the social and cultural changes involved in this rift which are linked to massive changes in the global system, as well as taking up a selection of issues that I think can be used to remedy the current situation. These issues include questions concerning the interface between social and biological processes, what certain natural scientists, Jacob, Prigogine, Goodwin and others have proposed that bridge some of these unnecessary rifts.
Last updated by: Halldór Stefánsson, 1 August 2007
EMBL Web Support